THOMAS A. RUBIN, CPA, CMA, CMC, CIA, CGFM, CFM
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

                                             Section                                                                 Page

 

Thomas A. Rubin, Consultant                                                                    2

Southern California Rapid Transit District Experience                              10

Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District Experience                                              12

Experience with California State Government                                          13

Experience with State Departments of Transportation                              14

Experience with California Transportation Agencies                                 15

Financial Planning and Analysis                                                               17

Financial Audit                                                                                        19

Management Information Systems                                                                       21

Capital Project Management and Audit                                                   23

Performance Audit and Performance Management Systems                     25

Merger and Reorganization                                                                                 26

Contracting and Privatization                                                                   27

Expert/Expert Witness                                                                            28

Miscellaneous Transportation                                                                  32

Non-Transportation                                                                                            35

Professional and Civic Association Activities                                           37

Education, Licenses, and Professional Certifications                                 41

Speeches and Papers                                                                                          42

References                                                                                                         51


THOMAS A. RUBIN, CONSULTANT

 

I have been engaged as a self-employed consultant and author for the periods June 1994 to July 1995 and since June 1996.  During these times, my clients have included:

 

                     Since June, 2001, I have been working with the School Construction Bond Citizens’ Oversight Committee for the Los Angeles Unified School District, assisting them in overseeing the expenditure of almost $10 billion in proceeds from three voter-approved bond issues, and over $5 billion in funding from other sources, for renovation of existing schools and construction of new ones, the largest local/municipal government construction program in the history of the United States.

 

           NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) – Beginning in September 1994, I served as an expert in the Federal Labor/Community Strategy Center (L/CSC) et al v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) et al Title VI (discrimination in the utilization of Federal grant funds) class action lawsuit.  As part of my work, I prepared several declarations and two expert reports, advised plaintiffs and counsel on transit operations and financial matters, and made written and oral presentations to the MTA Board of Directors, the State Senate Transportation Committee, the California Transportation Commission, and the mediator appointed by the Court.  I was also deposed by defense counsel for four days regarding my expert reports and assisted plaintiff counsel in its deposition of defendant personnel.  After two years of intensive pre-trial preparation, and a preliminary injunction largely granting the plaintiff's requests, the suit was settled on terms highly favorable to the plaintiff.  The plaintiff's requested remedy was changes in MTA project funding, transit service quality and quantity improvements, and transit fare policies and practices, rather than monetary damages.  The dollar value of the shift of funding has been estimated in a range of over $700 million (defendants) to $1.5 to $3 billion (plaintiffs).

 

The reduced fares, reduction in overcrowding on buses, new bus routes, and other transit improvements required by the Consent Decree have resulted in a total turnaround of MTA transit ridership.  In the eleven years prior to the execution of the Consent Decree in late 1996, MTA had lost an average of over 12 million riders years; in the six years following the Consent Decree, MTA added an average of over 13 million riders a year.

 

I have been engaged in monitoring MTA's compliance with its commitments the "Joint Working Group" process established by the Consent Decree since 1996, a process that is expected to continue for several more years.  I have prepared numerous expert reports and declarations, have been deposed on multiple occasions, made presentations to the Special Master appointed by the Court, have testified in Federal District Court, and prepared commentary on MTA Draft Environmental Impact Statements/Environmental Impact Reports.

 


I have assisted plaintiff counsel and the plaintiffs in preparing successful presentations to the Special Master.  This produced first an advisory finding, then an enforceable order, for MTA to increase its level of service to the public to comply with the terms of the CD.  I have also assisted in the plaintiff’s successful defense of these orders before the District Court, a Ninth Circuit tribunal, and the entire Ninth Circuit. 

 

           As a subcontractor to Cambridge Systematics, Inc., I assisted the State of Washington Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee with a performance audit of the Washington State Department of Transportation Highways and Rail Programs.  My primary responsibilities were for the determination of the impacts of State statutes on prevailing wages and compliance with environmental regulations.

 

           I served as an expert to the law firm of Richard I. Fine & Associates in Raymond Veltman v. State of California.  This suit was brought to require a return of $50 million of Transportation Development Act sales tax funds that were transferred from MTA to the County of Los Angeles under a State statute.  Plaintiffs were successful in gaining a ruling that the statute was unconstitutional in Superior Court (reversed on appeal).  I assisted plaintiff counsel in formulating and structuring legal arguments and proofs, rendered a expert report and declaration, critiqued defendant's experts' reports, and testified as an expert in court.

 

           I assist the United Transportation Union (UTU), which represents MTA's bus and train operators and schedulers, in the labor contract negotiations and pension plan administration processes.  My primary areas of support are employee benefits, including pension and Social Security, and costing of proposals, and, during a 32-day strike, representing the UTU in testimony before a joint State Senate/Assembly hearing.  I also provide assistance in on-going pension plan administration matters.

 

I served as an expert to UTU in two arbitration actions against the MTA, where UTU alleged that MTA had improperly converted certain bus lines to be staffed with lower wage bus operators in violation of the bargaining agreement.  I prepared a declaration and testified re MTA and common industry definitions of terms in the agreement and prepared an analysis of MTA’s (failures in) compliance of the agreement.  The arbitrator found for the UTU.  In a later arbitration, I assisted UTU in the determination of penalties against MTA for the first violation.

 

I am currently assisting UTU and the Amalgamated Transportation Union (ATU) , which represents MTA mechanics, service attendants, and certain related functions, in analyzing and responding to MTA proposals to restructure transit service delivery in Los Angeles County and in responding to proposed changes in State legislation.

 


I also assisted ATU in attempting to gain passage of a State law requiring MTA to make contributions to the ATU Health and Welfare fund.

 

           I served as an expert, assisting the law firm of Neyhart, Anderson, Fretas, Flynn & Grosboll, in Neil Silver et al v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Administration.  The plaintiff alleged that MTA improperly removed certain MTA employees from coverage under the Social Security Act Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program and improperly paid the OASDI contributions and related taxes on such payments for certain MTA employees, not including the plaintiffs.  I assisted plaintiff counsel in formulating and structuring legal arguments and proofs and rendered a declaration.

 

                     For the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF), with Wendell Cox, I prepared a report, Trolley Folly – A Feasibility Study of VIA’s Light Rail Plan[1], examining the feasibility and utility light rail/sales tax increase ballot referendum proposed by VIA Metropolitan Transit in San Antonio.  Along with other experts on both sides of the issue, I also participated in one televised and one webcast debate and made presentations to various audiences.  The light rail/sales tax proposal was defeated, 70% to 30%.

 

I also assisted TPPF in its opposition to a referendum proposal by Dallas Area Rapid Transit to extend its debt term authority from the current five years to thirty years in order to speed construction of light rail lines and certain other transportation projects.  My responsibilities included analysis of the cost per added trip ($37.70), review of sales tax growth projections, examination of passenger growth and fare increase projections, preparation and presentation of reports on these and related topics, and participation in a debate.  Wendell Cox and I prepared The DART Long Term Debt Issue: Unnecessary Costs and High Risks, August 2000.  The proposal was successful at the polls.

 

Also with Wendell Cox, I prepared a report for TPPF on long-term surface transportation options for the State of Texas, including debt financing, The Road Ahead: Innovations for Better Transportation in Texas.

 

           For the Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (San Jose, California), I assisted in the selection of legal counsel for financing and employee benefits/pensions.  I also  assisted Valley Transit in the preparation for labor negotiations and the costing of changes to the labor agreements with three unions.

 


I also assisted VTA in its defense against major construction claims related to the Tasman Light Rail line, performing contract audit and construction project oversight-related work. 

                     For Metro Transit (Metropolitan County Transit Operations, Minneapolis/Saint Paul), I prepared four reports: (1) Costing of light rail and "rubber tire" guideway options for the Hiawatha Transit Corridor, (2) Analysis of operator labor wage, benefits, and work rules, (3)  Peer group analysis of Metro Transit operations, and (4) Metro Transit budget analysis.

 

           I served as an expert to the law firm of Richard I. Fine & Associates in Rex Foreman v. City of Los Angeles.  The plaintiff alleged that the City improperly utilized Special Parking Revenue Fund monies for purposes that were not allowed by the City Ordinance that authorized the creation of the Fund.  I assisted plaintiff counsel in formulating and structuring legal arguments and proofs, rendered an expert declaration, critiqued defendant's expert reports, and provided expert assistance in the plaintiff's deposition of defendant's expert.  After the plaintiff's case was presented, the case was settled on terms highly satisfactory to the plaintiff.

 

                     Along with Wendell Cox, I assisted Reclaim Our Allocated Dollars (ROAD) in an analysis and response to proposed surface transportation plans in Austin, Texas.  I participated in a televised debate, made presentations to civic groups, and co-prepared three papers, Options Ignored, Opportunities Lost: An Analysis of Affordable Transportation Options for Austin, October 13, 2000; Trolley Folly: A Critical Analysis of the Austin Light Rail Proposal, September 27, 2000; and Technical Appendix A: Exaggerating Benefits: A Critique fo the Hickling Lewis Brod Decision Economics, Inc. Analysis of Congestion Management Benefits of Light Rail[2].  These reports suggested superior alternatives to the proposed light rail system (including busways/high-occupancy vehicle/high occupancy tool lanes and improved freeway and surface street systems) and carefully reviewed projections made by light rail proponents.  The proposal to construct light rail was defeated at the polls.

 


           For the Reason Foundation, with funding from the Irvine Foundation, I wrote four papers (with co-author James E. Moore II of the University of Southern California): (1) "Why Rail Will Fail:  An Analysis of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Long Range Plan" (Policy Study No. 209, July 1996), (2) "Ten Transit Myths:  Misperceptions About Rail Transit in Los Angeles and the Nation" (Policy Study No. 218, November 1996), (3) "Rubber Tire Transit:  A Viable Alternative to Rail" (Policy Study No. 230, August 1997), (4) "Better Transportation Alternatives for Los Angeles" (Policy Study No. 232, September 1997).  With Professor Moore, Dean Peter Gordon of the University of Southern California School of Planning and Urban Design, and Robert Poole, President of the Reason Foundation, I co-authored, “Improving Transportation in the San Fernando Valley,” (Policy Study No. 249, January 1999)[3], authoring the chapter on transit and the introductory and conclusion chapters.

 

                     I served as an expert to the law firm of Richard I. Fine & Associates in Jerry L. Counts, an individual, Kurt Hathaway, an individual, and Edward C. Waldheim, an individual v. Pete Wilson, Governor of the State of California, Kathleen Connell, Controller of the State of California, and Craig Brown, Director of Finance of the State of California.  The plaintiff alleged that the State had improper utilized off-road vehicle registration funds and other funds that were dedicated, by law, for specific off-road vehicle and recreational purposes for the general fund.  The trial court found for the plaintiff and the defendant appeal of this decision was not successful.

 

                     For PTI Journal, James E. Moore II and I wrote "Rail Transit in Los Angeles:  A Faustian Bargain?"  (1997, Volume 11, Number 1).

 

                     I served as an expert, assisting the firm of Bricklin & Gendler, LLP, in Save Our Valley v. Sound Transit (Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority) and the United States Department of Transportation (W.D. Wash., No. 200-0715R).  The plaintiffs alleged that Sound Transit violated numerous environmental justice protections in proposing to construct a surface light rail line down Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard South that would destroy businesses and residences on both sides of the street, restrict automotive and pedestrian traffic, and expose local residents to a high risk of train-vs.-auto and train-vs.-pedestrian incidents, while constructing totally separated rail track, including major subway sections, in all other portions of the alignment.  My work included review of the safety, security, and traffic flow of the proposed project, as well as the financial aspects.

 

                     Working as an expert/expert witness for the Texas Legal Foundation, plaintiff counsel in Rob Todd and Alan Vogel v. The City of Houston, Texas and Metropolitan Transportation Authority of Harris County, Texas (1999 Number 48884 in District Court of Houston, Texas, 190th Judicial District), I testified in support of the claim that the defendants had improperly refused to hold an election prior to the City allowing MTA to construct a light rail line on City streets, following the presentation of a petition with a sufficient number of valid signatures.  Plaintiffs were successful in District Court, but were reversed on appeal.

 


                     I prepared an analysis of the Southern California Association of Governments’ Regional Transportation Plan for Environmental Defense (e) (formerly Environmental Defense Fund).  I also assisted e in the analysis of a proposed transportation plan for Marin and Sonoma Counties, California.  The e report was highly critical of a proposed rail proposal.  The sales tax to fund the proposal was defeated in both counties.

 

I also prepared an analysis of the fare levels of the Los Angeles MTA and presented it to the MTA Board on behalf of Environmental Defense, the Natural Resources Defense Council,  the Coalition for Clean Air, the Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, and Communities for a Better Environment.  Our proposal to reduce MTA fares was not accepted by the MTA Board, but MTA management’s proposal to raise fares was not, either.

 

I also assisted e in an open space project in the lower income, largely minority areas of Los Angeles County, including the establishment of soccer fields and training facilities.  As a result of the activities initiated by e, a prime location in the core central city, originally planned to be converted to a warehouse/distribution center, was funded by the State of California to be made into a vitally needed inner city park.

 

                     I served as an expert to the law firm of Richard I. Fine & Associates in Norman Amjadi and Los Angeles County Association of Environment Health Specialists v. Board of Supervisors of The Los Angeles County, Sally Reed, Chief Administrative Officer, and Robert Gates, Director of the Department of Health Services (BC 110446).  Plaintiffs alleged that the County improperly and illegally increased public health inspection and license fees without typing such fees to actual costs of performance.  I prepared a report and testified re the accounting requirements under the law and the County’s actual actions.  The Court found for the plaintiffs in this matter.

 

                     Working for the law firm of Hale Lane Peak Dennison Howard and Anderson in Las Vegas, I analyzed the transportation and financial aspects of the proposed extension of the MGM Grand-Bally’s, Inc. monorail.  This monorail was proposed to be financed with over $600 million of tax-exempt bonds to be issued by the State of Nevada, backed solely by the fare revenues to be generated by the project.  With Jon Twichell and counsel, I prepared reports critiquing the ridership and revenue projections of the project proponents, disclosing the highly favorable financial arrangements for the project proponents, the high price and low carrying capacity of the selected technology, and describing the credit risks to the bondholders.  The project was approved by the State to proceed, but only after the proponents had agreed to a bond guarantee – reportedly at one of the highest premiums in history – to protect the bondholders against the failure of the project to achieve projected ridership and revenue.

 


                     I assisted the Clark Atlanta University Environmental Justice Resource Center with a review of transit and transportation alternatives in the Greater Atlanta area, including allocation of financial resources to capital and operating projects and compliance with Federal air quality requirements, while fulfilling environmental justice concerns.  My work included review of the capital and operating budgets and financial results of the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority, statutory requirements for utilization of tax funds and maintenance of financial ratio’s, and financial projections to form an opinion on the requirement for, and the timing of, a transit fare increase; presentations at several public hearings, interest group meetings, and community meetings; meetings with elected representatives; and preparation of reports and graphic handouts.

 

                     I assisted Perkins Coie LLP as an expert/expert witness in Citizens for Mobility; Stuart Weiss; Donald F. Padelford; Richard Nelson; Richard Fike; Thomas Coad; and Emery Bundy v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of Transportation, Nuria I. Fernandez, Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration; Helen M. Knoll, Regional Director, Federal Transit Administration, Region X; U.S. Department of Transportation; Federal Transit Administration; and Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Agency (W.D. Wash., No. C00-1812Z).  Plaintiffs alleged that Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Agency prepared and acted on an false and improper environmental impact statement in approving the Central Link light rail project.

 

                     I assisted Cleveland, Haddon & Metz in Robert Torres et al v. MTA.  Plaintiffs alleged that their employer, MTA, unfairly discriminated in employee benefits in favor of former employees of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission and against the former employees of the Southern California Rapid Transit District after the 1993 merger that formed MTA.  I assisted counsel in documenting differences in treatment of employees and their impacts.

 

                     I assisted the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce to review a light rail transit proposal to be funded by a sales tax increase.  Based on the analysis by CofC staff, myself, and another consultant, the CofC Board voted to oppose the plan and tax.  I later assisted Citizens for Responsible Spending, which was formed to oppose the plan, in defeating the proposal, 60%/40%.

 

                     I assisted the Cities of Fremont and Newark, California, in reviewing the allocation of revenues, costs, and transit services to their cities over a multi-year period by the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District in accordance with the annexation agreement.

 

                     I assisted the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, locals 3150 and 3634, in their contract negotiations with MTA.  AFSCME represents first line transit operations and maintenance supervisors.

 


                     I am assisting Cades Schutte LLP in Sensible Traffic Alternatives and Resources, Ltd. v Federal Transit Administration and City & County of Honolulu Department of Transportation Services et al in a challenge to the Environmental Impact Statements for the “Primary Corridor Transportation” Bus Rapid Transit project “Initial Operating Segment” in Honolulu.

 

                     Working with Citizens Organized for Smart Transit (COST) in the San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles County, I had a major role in a successful challenge to the State of California Environmental Impact Report for what is now known as the “Orange Line” Bus Rapid Transit project in COST v MTA.  I am continuing to work with COST and its legal counsel in forcing a proper analysis of alternatives, specifically including “Rapid Bus” service (higher speed bus service on arterial streets).

 

                     Working with the law firm of Rowley & Klauser, LLP, I prepared an expert report analyzing the safety and security of debt service payments to bond holders of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (Sound Transit) in the event of Sound Transit’s loss of motor vehicle excise tax receipts as a result of the passage of State of Washington initiative 776.


SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT EXPERIENCE

 

I served as Controller-Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) of the Southern California Rapid Transit District from June 1989 until the merger that formed the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) in April of 1993.  After passing on the position of Chief Financial Officer of MTA, I continued as an MTA employee until June of 1994.  SCRTD, the largest transit operator in the State of California and the third largest in the United States, was a 9,000-employee public transit system with a $700 million per year operating budget and a capital budget of over $300 million per year.  As a Board-appointed and Board-accountable officer of the District, my duties included responsibility for almost $200 million a year in expenditures and the following departments and functions:

 

           Accounting and Fiscal – All financial and accounting activities of the District, including general accounting, payroll, accounts payable and receivable, fixed assets, payroll, cashier, farebox cash counting, pass and ticket sales accounting, and construction project and grant accounting.  Under my direction, the District was awarded the  Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the GFOA for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report in its first year of application.  I initiated and directed a program to replace tickets with tokens, which will result in over $5 million per year in annual savings through reduction of counterfeiting and more efficient fare processing.  I was responsible for all financial reports and grantor agency relations for over $1.8 billion of grant-funded projects, including the largest single Federal grant program in the nation at the time, the Los Angeles "Red Line" subway.

 

           Human Resources – Employment, compensation, employee benefits, training, special projects (employee wellness, child care, employee magazine), employee activities, and retirement income program (pension plans, Section 457 deferred compensation plan, 401(k) plan).  The District human resources program was nationally respected, including establishing one of the first, and still the most comprehensive, substance abuse programs in the industry.

 

           Management Information Systems – Design, implementation, management, and operations of one of the most sophisticated comprehensive transit operator management information systems in the world.  SCRTD software has frequently been transferred to other transit operators.

 


           Risk Management – Placement of the District's insurance coverages, management of our public liability and workers' compensation contractors (each approximately $30 million per year self-insured, third party administered), and safety.  The District set new all-time safety records in each of my last three years and reduced risk management costs by over $10 million per year, due in large part to a nationally recognized safety and claims management activities.  I spent a great deal of time working with my two rail safety engineers attempting to reduce the collision/fatality rates on the Long Beach Blue Line, which, unfortunately, has proven to be the most dangerous light rail line in the United States by a wide margin.  I was the first to suggest the use of “four-quadrant” gates, which, unlike the more common “two-quadrant” gates, block both sides of the street, making it more difficult to drive around the lowered crossing gate arms and into the paths of on-coming trains.

 

           Treasury – Management District short-and long-term debt, investment of District cash assets (up to $200 million), management of the assets held by the District's four pension plans (over $500 million), and management of other related funds ($300 million).  The District commonly turned over $125-150 million in revenue anticipation notes per year.  I also placed approximately $500 million of long-term debt.  I structured a Japanese cross boarder leases that are provided over $1 million in direct bottom line cash.  The District enjoyed extremely favorable interest rates on its outstanding debt, the investment of District funds consistently achieved returns well in excess of industry norms, and the pension plans were funded in excess of 105%.

 

           Management and Budget – Preparation of the District's short- and long-range financial plans and budgets, relations with grantor agencies from grant application to grant close-out, and preparation of internal performance measurement reports and evaluations.

 

I represented the public transit industry, presenting testimony supporting the dollar coin, before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs Subcommittee on Consumer Affairs and Coinage.

 

I have also served on, or chaired, several District-wide committees, including the New Services Review Board, the Budget Review Committee, the four District pension plan administrative committees, the Pension Investments Committee (Chair), the Personnel Review Committee, and the Southern California Rapid Transit Finance Corporation (Chair).  I served as General Manager pro tem on several occasions in the absence of the General Manager.


ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT EXPERIENCE

 

I served as Assistant General Manager-Finance of the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District in Oakland, California, from July 1995 to June 1996.  In this position, I directed a staff of over 100 professional and clerical staff members responsible for:

 

           Accounting – All financial and accounting activities of the District, including general accounting, payroll, accounts payable and receivable, fixed assets, payroll, and construction project and grant accounting.  Under my direction, the District was awarded the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, making it one of fewer than 20 transit operators in the nation to receive this prestigious award.

           Benefits – Medical, life insurance, long-term disability, workers' compensation, and other benefits for almost 2,000 employees and over 2,000 retirees

           Budget – Preparation of operational and capital budgets for $150 million+ a year agency and financial elements of Short-Range Financial Plan plus monitoring of performance and performance measures.  The District was one of a handful of transit operators to receive the GFOA Award for Distinguished Budget Presentation.

           Information Systems – Operation and expansion of integrated business mini-computer based information systems, expansion of personal computer LAN/WAN network, and telephone system operations and expansion

           Procurement and Stores – Procurement of over $50 million a year in goods, services, and capital assets; operation of central storeroom and four division storerooms; and print shop operations

           Retirement – Management of $135 million+ pension plan and Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plan

           Risk Management – Placement of Property Damage/Public Liability, Property, and other coverages; management of claims inventory averaging over 1,000 per year

           Treasury – Management of over $50 million in District cash plus oversight of pension fund investments, placement of District debt, operation and repair of over 700 fareboxes and four division cash collection systems, oversight of cash counting contractor

 

In a time of fiscal distress, I developed a plan to generate over $2 million of new revenues through cross-boarder leases, COPs advance refinancing, COPs reserve fund investment return improvement, cash management improvements, and RANs issuance/legal arbitrage, and implemented the RANs while at AC Transit.  I did financial analysis and inter-governmental liaison for a proposed parcel tax and a renewal of the Alameda County transportation sales tax.  Under my direction, we significantly reduced medical insurance, public liability/property damage, and property insurance premiums and implemented a Section 125 child care program.

 

I also negotiated settlement of $7+ million pension plan funding dispute with bargaining units and commenced the process of wholesale change of outdated pension plan provisions.  I served as Acting General Manager on several occasions in the absence of the General Manager.


EXPERIENCE WITH CALIFORNIA STATE GOVERNMENT

 

           California Department of Transportation – Preparation of manual on procurement and management of contract transit services (I took SCRTD position shortly after commencement of this project)

 

           California Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality (DWQ)

 

··          Operational audit of DWQ's billion-dollar-a-year clean water grant program

··          Information requirements study and management information systems design for a comprehensive management information system for the Board, including the preparation and presentation of a feasibility study report.  I also did an extensive study of potential systems to meet the Board's requirements, resulting in the selection and modification of a system currently being used by another State agency.

··          Design of an audit program and organization of an audit and project oversight department for DWQ


EXPERIENCE WITH STATE DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION

 

           Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation and Construction – Design and implementation of a state-wide transit performance measurement system

 

           Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Public Transportation:

 

··          Assisted Ohio transit operators with applying the principles of financial capacity analysis to their long-term planning

··          Strategic planning study and organizational review

 

           Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Legislative Budget and Finance Committee – Operational audits of the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation:

 

··          Contracting for and control over service contracts

··          Internal management and accounting controls

 

           State of Washington Department of Transportation – Arrangement of safe-harbor lease, which involved obtaining passage of a new Federal law to allow W-DOT to realize over $15 million from the sale of depreciation rights on ferries

 

                     State of Washington Joint Legislative Audit Committee – As a subcontractor to Cambridge Systematics, Inc., I assisted in the performance audit of the State of Washington Department of Transportation.  My responsibilities were the costs of environmental compliance and compliance with Federal and State construction labor rate/employee benefit requirements.


EXPERIENCE WITH CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES

 

I have served the following California transportation agencies with audit and consulting projects, as described in more detail in other sections of this qualifications statement:

 

           Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District

           Alameda County Transportation Authority

           California Department of Transportation

           Central Contra Costa Transit District

                     City of Fremont

           Fresno County Transportation Authority

           Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District

           Laguna Beach Municipal Transit Lines

           Laidlaw Transit, Inc.

           Lodi Dial-a-Ride

           Long Beach Public Transit Corporation

           Los Angeles County Transportation Commission

           Metropolitan Transportation Commission

           Monterey Peninsula Transit

           Monterey-Salinas Transit

                     City of Newark

           Orange County Consolidated Transportation Service Agency

           Orange County Transit District

           Orange County Transportation Commission

           Ripon Transit System

           Riverside Transit Agency

           Sacramento Regional Transit District

           Salinas Transit System

           San Diego Transit Corporation

           San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District

           San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board

           San Joaquin County Council of Governments

           San Francisco Municipal Railway

           San Mateo County Transit District

           Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District

           Santa Clara County Transit District

           Santa Clara County Transportation Agency

                     Santa Clara Valley Transportation Agency

           Southern California Association of Governments

           Southern California Rapid Transit District

           South Coast Area Transit

           Southern California Association of Governments

           Stockton Metropolitan Transit District


           Town of Tiburon

           TRACY TRANS

           Walnut Creek Transit System


                            FINANCIAL PLANNING AND ANALYSIS

 

           Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit Authority – Tax subsidy allocation project

 

           Los Angeles County Transportation Commission – Preparation of financial forecasts for the Official Statement for $707 million bond issue, one of the largest in the history of the U.S. transit industry

 

           Metro-Dade Transit Agency (Miami) – Long-range operations/capital/financial models and forecasts used to support a sales tax referendum to fund transit

 

           Metropolitan Transportation Commission – Long-term capital/operating/finance model and study

 

           National League of Cities – Developed a manual on applying financial capacity analysis to city-owned and operated transit systems

 

           Orange County Transit District – Long-term capital/operating financial analysis and modeling

 

           Orange County